From: Arlo Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Mon Dec 05 2005 - 18:22:39 GMT
Hi Mike,
A polite way of saying, "shut the f&#$ up!"?? :-)
Actually, your succinct way of putting the argument below I'd say is 99%
accurate. What I was hoping to make clear is that it is the dialogic
relation between individuals and collectives on each MOQ level that
sustains the levels and allows the emergence of the next higher level.
As I restated the words of Pirsig in an email to Platt, the "individual" is
contained within the "collective", and the "collective" is contained within
the "individual", with no contradiction. It is, in my opinion, only a
fool's quest to not only demand the two are distinct, but that one is
utterly more valuable than the other. Like saying the Yin is all there is,
and the Yang is incidental. Of course, since the Randian Weltanshauung has
no language for anything other than the Supremeity of the Lone Individual,
all Platt hears is that I favor the "collective", a threat he responds to
only with rhetorical fear of "the state" and "gulags".
An adequate sum of the dialogue could go something like this:
Platt: The Yin is supreme!
Arlo: Actually, the Yang is important too.
Platt: Commie!
Arlo: No, you see, it is the energy of the Yin-Yang interaction that is
what's important.
Platt: So, you're saying the Yin is nothing but dirt.
Arlo: What? No. I'm saying that the Yang creates the Yin in the same way
the Yin creates the Yang.
Platt: So I guess you're in favor of killing the Yin. Where have I heard
that before? Oh, yes, Arlo is a Stalinist.
Arlo: No, I do see the value of the Yin, as I see the value of the Yang.
But in both cases I see the emergent value of their interaction as greater
than the two apart.
Platt: Round up your kids, everyone, Gulag Leader Arlo is coming to kill
all the Yins and send everyone in America to a prison camp.
Arlo: C'mon, I said I see the value of the Yin, I'm arguing that what comes
from the interaction is what's valuable. Indeed, I don't think it's really
possible to separate the two to begin with.
Platt: So, Yin doesn't count. Yin is nothing and your favor the state's
right to kill it.
Arlo: No, I favor looking at the Yin-Yang relationship.
Platt: Only the Yin matters. We should rename the entire diagram "Just
Yin". Yang is, after all, nothing but a Marxist, liberal plot to devalue
the Yin.
Arlo: No, Yang is important too, equally so, as they contain and create
each other.
Platt: Commie!
etc. etc. etc.
So while I agree that you got it 99% (and elegantly too, I'd add), I'd
restate my position to read, ""Lila" was in many ways shaped by Pirsig's
microgenetic, social, cultural and
philosophical background. The fact that the actual writing of "Lila" was
undertaken by Pirsig as an individual is a banal truism." I use
"microgenetic" here in a way borrowed from socio-cultural theory to mean
the immediate experiences of Pirsig in coordination with the socio-cultural
shared experience of the collective consciousness he appropriated.
Arlo
At 09:18 AM 12/5/2005, you wrote:
>Please tell me if this is an accurate summary of your recent slew of
>correspondence on the MD:
>
>Platt: "Lila" was written by an individual, Robert Pirsig. The fact
>that he was influenced by other thinkers is a banal truism.
>Arlo: "Lila" was in many ways shaped by Pirsig's social, cultural and
>philosophical background. The fact that the actual writing of "Lila"
>was undertaken by Pirsig as an individual is a banal truism.
>
>So, aren't there things you would rather be talking about than banal truisms?
>
>Regards,
>Mike
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 05 2005 - 19:46:24 GMT