Re: [MD] Platt and Arlo

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Dec 05 2005 - 21:18:57 GMT

  • Next message: Arlo Bensinger: "Re: [MD] Platt and Arlo"
  • Next message: Case: "Re: [MD] MD Chaos and its role in Evolution"

    Hi Mike,

    > Please tell me if this is an accurate summary of your recent slew of
    > correspondence on the MD:
    >
    > Platt: "Lila" was written by an individual, Robert Pirsig. The fact
    > that he was influenced by other thinkers is a banal truism.
    > Arlo: "Lila" was in many ways shaped by Pirsig's social, cultural and
    > philosophical background. The fact that the actual writing of "Lila"
    > was undertaken by Pirsig as an individual is a banal truism.
    >
    > So, aren't there things you would rather be talking about than banal
    > truisms?

    The problem I have with Arlo (among others) is summed up by the following
    "truism" from Pirsig. In arguing that it's wrong to kill an individual
    criminal who poses no threat to collective society, he wrote:

    "And beyond that is an even more compelling reason; societies and thoughts
    and principles themselves are no more than sets of static patterns.These
    patterns can't by themselves perceive or adjust to Dynamic Quality. Only a
    living being can do that." (Lila, 13)

    So, if we subscribe to Arlo's belief that individuals and collectives are
    intertwined in some sort of equal symbiotic relationship like Yin and Yang
    we might as well all pack up and go home because without that individual
    living being responding to DQ, the MOQ becomes just another flat, barren,
    dried up metaphysics.

    Besides, what makes the U.S unique is that its founders believed that
    every citizen had the inalienable right to life, liberty and pursuit of
    happiness, not because it was granted by the collective state, but because
    it was granted by God. This meant for the first time in history that each
    person had an inalienable right to pursue his own ends, not serve as the
    means to the ends of others.

    If I didn't think these things were important, I would have given up on
    Arlo long ago. My hope is that somewhere along in our discussions, he will
    see that the response of an individual to DQ is not only what makes the
    MOQ stand out as a metaphysics, but is also what drives the dedication to
    individual opportunity and freedom in the West that millions have died to
    preserve.

    Best,
    Platt

        
    moq_discuss mailing list
    Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
    http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
    Archives:
    http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
    http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 05 2005 - 22:29:25 GMT