From: Michael Hamilton (thethemichael@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 16:31:59 GMT
Bo, this is just a brief message of support.
> Again, ZMM sees the early search for principles beyond the
> myths as the embryonic S/O. The principles "objective" and the
> old myths just "subjective". When will this sink in?
Soon, if you continue to explain yourself as succinctly as this!
The following is worth quoting too:
> "The Metaphysics of Quality resolves the relationship between
> intellect and society, subject and object, mind and matter, by
> embedding all of them in a larger system of understanding. Objects
> are inorganic and biological values; subjects are social and
> intellectual values. They are not two mysterious universes that go
> floating around in some subject-object dream that allows them no real
> contact with one another. They have a matter-of-fact evolutionary
> relationship." [LILA, p344]
>
> The impossible thing about this way of "encasing" the SOM inside
> the MOQ is that it sounds as if SOM still is valid: that societies
> are in our minds and that biology is "out there". This is out of
> tune with the MOQ that has declare the SOM nil an void. and
> consequently can have no relevance to its own levels this way.
This is of crucial importance.
Regards,
Mike
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 17:57:09 GMT