Re: MD Philosophy and Theology

From: Valence (valence10@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 00:38:06 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Intellectual Art (Dynamic Morality)"

    Hey DMB,

    > DMB says:
    > The conversation between you two about the meaning of the word "theology"
    > was very helpful. I agree with Sam's meaning, "what the religious
    community
    > says about itself". As I understand it, theology is the study of the whole
    > system of doctrines and beliefs that define a particular religion. Its
    > sectarian by definition. That's exactly why I think it is NOT
    intellectual....

    RICK
    Defined in that way, I'd agree that "theology" would not be intellectual
    pattern. It would just be more "static social fallout" from Dynamic
    experience.

    > DMB says:
    > The quote from the SOVD paper has me thinking that Pirsig means "theology"
    > as Rick has it, as a form of philosophy of religion. Some support from
    Lila
    > would be very helpful and even more convincing, but I doubt we'd find it.

    RICK
    I think we already have the evidence. If 'sectarian religion' is a static
    *social* fallout from Dynamic Quality (see LILA ch30 p431) and 'theology' is
    an *intellectual* pattern (see SODV) then assuming Pirsig didn't change his
    mind about something and is not contradicting himself, 'theology' logically
    cannot mean 'sectarian religion'.

    DMB
     In
    > any case, we both agree that there are genuine intellectual approaches to
    > religion and such, its just that I wouldn't call that theology.

    RICK
    Fair enough.

    DMB
    Maybe it
    > really is just a matter of semantics, but I'd really like to hear you make
    a
    > case, my theology graduate friend. Does a theology student learn HOW to
    > think about god, or does a theology student learn WHAT to think about god?
    > That's a little too simple and too harsh, but you understand the question,
    > no? Does a theology student learn about god, or how to be a priest?

    RICK
    The theologian studies that which the disciple believes. He doesn't learn
    'how' or 'what' to think about god, rather, he learns 'how' and 'what'
    various given groups think about god. I would think that generally jives
    with what Sam means by "A theology student, in my experience, is taught
    various ways HOW to think about God." Only I see it as an objective
    process, and Sam thinks it's a matter of sectarianism.

    take care
    rick

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 00:39:45 BST