Re: MD Burden of Proof

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 19:14:06 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD Philosophy and Theology"

    Hey Platt:

    > > My awareness seems to be a field generated by my DNA like a gravity
    field
    > > around a planet.

    On 02 April 2003 5:55AM Platt writes:
    How about looking at it another way? Since bodily organs directly or
    indirectly respond to and utilize environmental phenomena (lungs-air,
    stomach-food, eyes-scene) perhaps the brain likewise responds to and
    utilizes a field of awareness already present in the environment.

    joe: I find it difficult to discuss a field of awareness as a pattern. I
    want to be able to appeal to an intuition of awareness. I can appeal to an
    intuition of a field of awareness generated by my DNA and everyone can look
    to their own awareness. Is awareness in the individual or "present in the
    environment"? I would say both, and I am a tree-hugger. Is awareness only
    in the environment, and present in me as part of a pattern? I do not want
    to change the awareness in the environment, until I know to change myself.
    I want to be able to practice changing my awareness, and if I am wrong to go
    in another direction.

    Platt:
    Furthermore, perhaps this field of awareness is Dynamic Quality that a
    newborn baby responds to without mediation.

    joe: I have never thought of it that way. I have no way to say yes or no
    to that except in regard to change. I change myself.

    Platt:
    Perhaps it is the "pre-intellectual" value identified in the MoQ that lies
    between the subject and the object, a value more immediate and directly
    sensed than any self or any object later assigned by the "patterning" mind.

    joe: 'Subject', 'object', 'mind', these are words I prefer not to use at
    this time.

    Platt:
    I'm confused by your claim that there are "three aspects of dq present in
    the formation of patterns."

    joe: I accept intuition. I think Pirsig does. I want to use words.
    Instead of abstraction as a basis for words, I use 'forming a pattern' to
    which I assign a word.

    I accept by intuition that I exist. 'Existence' becomes an aspect of the
    pattern.

    I accept by intuition that I act. 'Purpose' becomes an aspect of the
    pattern.

    I intuit. (This is different than I act.) 'Quality' becomes an aspect of
    the pattern.

    I do not want to use a lot of words, until I see a framework of what words
    are. "In the beginning was the word.". I hope that helps.

    Joe

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 19:12:07 BST