From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 21:44:56 BST
Hi Johnny,
> We still use "more moral" the same way though, because when you say
> something is "more moral" you are presumably asserting that most people
> would agree with you about what to choose, at least once you've had a chance
> to explain your understanding of the situation, right?
Not at all. When I say something is more moral, I mean it actually is
better--as if quality is real. If you can't make this basic assumption, I
wonder what value you could possibly find in reading Pirsig. Without it, I
don't think we have enough common ground to make discussion of the MOQ
fruitful.
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 21:47:56 BST