Re: MD Philosophy and Theology

From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Sat Apr 05 2003 - 07:29:26 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD What is a fact?"

    Hi David,

    Briefly...

    >
    > DMB says:
    > Misconstruing? It seems that you said something very much like this claim
    > yourself....
    > Not something that can be proven by reason? Can't be "achieved" by the
    > unaided human reason? you either see it or you don't? C'mon, Sam. This is
    > not very different from the Oxford Companion's "philosophical appraisal
    has
    > no legitimacy in relation to". I think you're trying way too hard. It
    seems
    > you're engaged in a disagreement with an encyclopedia and with yourself.
    :-)

    I think you've missed the difference I was trying to draw.

    > Backing way up, this discussion about the difference between theology and
    > philosophy has spawned more than a few unintended insults.

    I actually thought there were fewer insults than normal. What can you be
    thinking of?

    ;-)

    Sam

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 15:04:59 BST