RE: MD Philosophy and Theology

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Apr 06 2003 - 03:56:36 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD Philosophy and Theology"

    Scott, Sam and all:

    Let me have another go at this....

    Scott said:
    In sum, the Bible is seen as telling a lot about God (and people)
    mythically, while theologians attempt to translate that telling into
    something the intellect can handle.

    DMB says:
    Here's the problem. I keep saying that the problem with religion today is
    that most people mistake myths for facts, which is not to say they aren't
    true. The take a myth for a fact is to misunderstand the myth. Sure, the
    intellect can read the symbolism of a myth and detect its meaning, but that
    is not taking it literally. More importantly, such philosophical analysis
    can not replace the function of the myth. As in the quote about the
    resonance of an "affect image", its not supposed to be understood as an
    intellectual concept, but experienced directly so that a more ancient level
    is stirred. It can be described and analyzed later, but it that is the ONLY
    way a myth can be related or understood, then it is dead and its power is
    gone. So its not just a matter of rampant fundamentalism, scientific
    materialism and widespread misunderstanding, althought that's true too, but
    that the mythological images of our culture are very far removed from the
    kind of world that we live in that they can no longer function, they can no
    longer evoke in us what they used to. We can try to do some literary
    archeology and try to reconstruct the context in which these symbols
    actually had a living meaning, but the very fact that we need to do that
    only shows how dead they are. I think the underlying message and meaning of
    the world's great religions is still perfectly valid, but that we need an
    appropriate mythology to express it, one that doesn't have all the apparent
    contradictions with our world view.

    A scientist was asked by a caller, perhaps not seriosly expecting an answer,
    what the universe was BEFORE the big bang. He launched into to this very
    interesting idea that before the big bang, there was no time, space, matter
    or anything like that. It was all bound up in a perfect symmetry; matter and
    anti-matter cancelling each other out perfectly and so on. Then something
    happened to upset that balance and BANG! The universe began to unfold.
    Amazed, the interviewer asked, "What happened? What tipped the balance?" "I
    don't know," said the scientist flatly, shrugging his sholders. And with his
    Indian accent, said, "God got bored."

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 06 2003 - 03:58:37 BST