Re: MD What is a fact?

• Previous message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD What is a fact?"
• In reply to: Platt Holden: "Re: MD What is a fact?"
• Next in thread: Platt Holden: "MD Undeniable Facts"
• Reply: Platt Holden: "MD Undeniable Facts"
• Reply: Wim Nusselder: "MD The Eudaimonic MoQ (standard account)"
• Reply: Wim Nusselder: "MD The Eudaimonic MoQ (choosing unit & conclusions)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Platt,

> >To my mind
> > 'intellect' does not describe something distinct between level three and
> > level four of the MoQ. What is distinct is the creative individual,
which
> > is why I think the individual (properly conceived) is the best way to
> > characterise level 4.
>
> I wholeheartedly agree. Would you care to expand on your "properly
> conceived" caveat?

I am putting up on my website a summary essay relating to my proposal to
reconceive the MoQ:

http://www.elizaphanian.v-2-1.net/Eudaimonic-moq.htm

I'm also sending a copy to Horse; if he thinks it's OK, he can put it up on
the MoQ site.

Cheers
Sam

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Platt Holden: "MD Undeniable Facts"
• Previous message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD What is a fact?"
• In reply to: Platt Holden: "Re: MD What is a fact?"
• Next in thread: Platt Holden: "MD Undeniable Facts"
• Reply: Platt Holden: "MD Undeniable Facts"
• Reply: Wim Nusselder: "MD The Eudaimonic MoQ (standard account)"
• Reply: Wim Nusselder: "MD The Eudaimonic MoQ (choosing unit & conclusions)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 13:00:27 BST