From: Paul Turner (pauljturner@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 20:02:03 BST
Hi Platt
I think you misunderstood my point. I understand the
statements, as I understand the MoQ. It's not the
statements in isolation I have trouble with, its when
you add them together that I have a problem.
What do you think of the conclusions I have drawn, can
you come to any other conclusion without adding to or
changing the statements?
a) Lila is not a living being
b) Living beings are not static patterns of value, in
which case they must be Dynamic Quality
c) Living beings are both static and Dynamic Quality
which means Lila is in some sense the source of all
things, and is evolving toward herself
Thanks
Paul
__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 25 2003 - 20:02:49 BST