From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 20:21:53 BST
Hi Squonk and Steve
I don't know if Steve viewed it as philosophological
or not. That's just how I saw it and how I found it
useful. I simply wanted to tell Steve that, and share
a similar interpretation. I have my own philosophical
ideas and I'm seeing how the they fit with the MoQ.
You see, I am still struggling to come to grips with
the MoQ. Right now I appreciate anything that attempts
to make things clearer, even if it may eventually be
misleading.
sq: Sounds like you have a fine way of looking at things. Which is good to
hear.
If I go round in circles, in time I may choose another
way to try and understand the MoQ, your suggestion of
MoQ research maybe?
sq: I think i have allot to learn from you. Makes a great change to hear one
who is not looking to turn the MoQ inside out and forget about Quality.
> The cavalry has arrived...
...on a broken down motorcycle, can you help me fix
it?
cheers
Paul
sq: You can tell by the sound of the engine. Engines play great music don't
you feel? I wonder if i could get a record deal?
"36 all time best sounding engines going up through the cogs." ;)
squonk
P.S. actually, i know a mechanic who listens to a free CD he got with a car
mag that DOES give you the sound of car engines as they belt around a track.
Quality in car engines.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 12 2003 - 20:23:55 BST