RE: RE: MD Structuralism in Pirsig

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat May 24 2003 - 21:40:10 BST

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"

    Matt and all:

    Hmmm. You have some interesting and self-contradictory views on politics and
    philosophy....

    Matt:
    He goes to great lengths in his Spinoza lectures and in other places to
    discourage people like Derrida, Norris, and Culler from thinking that
    philosophy is a good political tool.

    dmb says:
    Postmodernism is NOT to be used in politics. Rorty goes to great lengths to
    pint this out. I see.

    Matt:
    I think it makes the mistake of making philosophy a political weapon.
    Philosophy may be a good handmaiden to politics, but it is a poor master.

    dmb says:
    Philosophy is NOT to be used as a political weapon. The MOQ's mistake. I
    see.

    Matt:
    I always thought of the kinds of post-modernism I like as reinstituting
    values, in the form of praxis and politics. Politics are all about values.

    dmb says:
    Postmodernism is ALL ABOUT values and politics!? Huh? What happened? I
    thought that's where the MOQ went wrong. How did you change your mind so
    quickly and completely? Did you undergo a transcendental change during the
    composition of that post? Are you taking BOTH sides in order to avoid
    criticism? Or are you just stoned on cold medicine? :-)

    But seriously, you are aware of postmodernism's role in the current
    political debates and culture wars, no? (Sorry to disappoint you, but I was
    talking about social trends, current events and recent history, not Rorty in
    particular.) My point, which you seem to have missed, was only that the
    attack on race and gender based hierarchies is an extension of the attack on
    social values after WWI that Pirsig describes in such detail. This is only a
    problem to the extent that these social structures are regarded as arbitrary
    and meaningless. Again, as Pirsig explains in detail, there are good reasons
    why we should examine these structures with the intellect and see what they
    were trying to do. Only SOME traditions and social structure will prove to
    be arbitrary and meaningless. We dispose of the rest at our own peril. I
    mean, Pirsig talks about the problems we get from throwing the baby out with
    the bathwater, which is what postmodernism does to the extent that it throws
    out ALL hierarchies. This is what's going on whether you or Rorty like it or
    not, you know. In some pomo circles all hierarchies are seen as inherently
    oppressive.

    Watching babies go down the drain,
    DMB

     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 24 2003 - 21:39:26 BST