Re: MD DQ/SQ tension in government

From: Paul Turner (pauljturner@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 21:43:11 BST

  • Next message: nic nott: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"

    Hi Squonk

    > Hi Paul,
    > Applying DQ/SQ tension to social patterns, do you
    > feel it is appropriate to
    > suggest:
    > Institution = static social pattern - Celebrity =
    > Dynamic social pattern.

    Yes, I think celebrity in politics is clear to see.
    The social sense of value evoked in voting is directed
    to some degree by celebrity. The political media is a
    social pattern of value that supports celebrity.

    I think politicians have to straddle the social and
    intellectual level carefully to be successful.
    Celebrity is clearly important at the social level; a
    charismatic leader carries the party along with it.
    The party policies are at the intellectual level and a
    leader has to bring about coherence amongst different
    intellectual patterns held by the party members.

    > Thus, a combination of the static component with a
    > Dynamic component produces
    > a DQ/SQ tension that has the possibility of
    > coherence?

    I think good political parties have that tension
    within them. The tension between members who hold to
    traditional ideology and those with more radical ideas
    is essential to keep the social pattern of value (the
    party) evolving. When the tension is just right, the
    whole party may be transformed for the better. The
    success (albeit temporary?) of the New Labour party in
    the nineties may be an example of that?

    > For example, one may envisage a Government (Static
    > social pattern) with a
    > Celebrity at its head - King/Queen, president, PM
    > (Dynamic social pattern.) The
    > relationship between the two may produce a well
    > balanced social pattern?

    Interesting choices, I recall Pirsig describing the
    King or constitution as a static pattern and
    parliament as the Dynamic eraser.

    In British government, you could argue there is a
    static house of lords and a Dynamic house of commons.

    I find the DQ-SQ tension concept a great way to put
    the MOQ to use in thinking about almost anything.
    These are just some initial ideas on government, I'll
    give it some more thought.

    cheers

    Paul

    __________________________________________________
    Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
    http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 08 2003 - 21:49:28 BST