Re: MD Edwards on Free Will

From: Barritt (mbarritt@nc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 01:54:22 BST

  • Next message: johnny moral: "Re: MD Free Will"

    One day, the universe awoke and asked, "now what do I want to do today?"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "johnny moral" <johnnymoral@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:09 AM
    Subject: MD Edwards on Free Will

    > Well, I may as well start on my promised citations from various books
    about
    > Jonathan Edwards with one about Free Will, or as the subject is known in
    the
    > theological realm, Arminianism, after its chief proponent Jacob Arminius.
    >
    > From James Carse's "Jonathan Edwards and the Visibility Of God:"
    >
    > By putting himself under the Lockean teaching that the proper question
    is
    > not whether the will be free but whether the man be free, Edwards was in a
    > position to formulate the nature of man's relationship to God that
    followed
    > neither the Arminians nor the traditional Calvinists. By way of a
    > preliminary definition, Edwards writes that the will "is plainly, that by
    > which the mind chooses anything, The faculty of the will is that faculty
    or
    > power or principle of mind by which it is capable of choosing: an act of
    the
    > will is the same as an act of choosing or choice." This is the
    > conventional definition, and it is not until we ask why the will chooses,
    > and what determines which object it will choose, that we find Edwards
    moving
    > out into his own territory. He answers that "it is that motive, which, as
    > it stands in the view of the mind, is the strongest, that determines the
    > will." A motive is not something operating on the will from the outside,
    > like one link on another or a rider on a horse, but it is rather the VIEW
    of
    > something external to the will.
    >
    > Edwards has eliminated the mechanistic description of the will's
    > operations, and replaced it with the living human mind. The human mind is
    > not an inert peice of equiptment that will wait in idleness until it is
    > activated by an external agent; it is life itself. It is the source of
    our
    > humanness; it is not a thing at all, but an action; it is our viewing of
    the
    > world, and our judging it; it is the richly interpenetrated confluence of
    > our passions and fears, our prejudice and our habits. To say that the
    mind
    > is anyone thing, or that it operates according to any one procedure, is
    > obviously impossible. To look directly into the human mind is to look
    > directly into a mystery which cannot be exhausted by any amount of
    > metaphorical descriptions. That the mind is located in the brain, or that
    > it is identical to some physical process, is manifest nonsense. Should we
    > cut open the skull and analyze by the subtlest scientific methods the
    > structure and compositoin of that organ we should know no more about the
    > ideas and thoughts and values that man had, than if we had attempted, by
    > studying the leg of a cadaver, to determine where he had wandered over the
    > face of this earth. It is this mystery which stands directly in Edwards
    > view. He knows that when he comes to that final statement of the nature
    of
    > the human will he must so state it that it will comprehend the whole
    > situation of man as an ever alive participant in the rushing currents of
    > history. He makes the statemenet with disarming coolness: "The will
    always
    > is as the greatest apparent good is."
    >
    > There are several arresting consequences to this. The first is that it
    > effectively elimiates from our talking about the will the necessity of
    > referring to determinancy. As Edwards explains,
    > " I have rather chosen to express myself thus, that the will always is
    as
    > the greatest apparent good, or as what seems most agreeable; because an
    > appearing most agreeable or pleasing to the mind, and the mind's
    preferring
    > and choosing, seem hardly to be properly and perfectly distinct."
    >
    > Another consequence is that it puts man out into the thrust and rush of
    > the historical process without giving him any access to eternal verities
    or
    > realities that can permanently withstand the change of the moment. Man is
    > restricted to what APPEARS to him; he cannot go behind the appearances to
    > the real thing. Here we can see how the boy still lives in the man
    [that's
    > in reference to his youthful idealism]; for there is in this statement the
    > same intellectual clarity that caused young Edwards to reject Locke's
    "magic
    > onions." [Carse's term for Locke's view of substance] We must emphasize
    > again that when Edwards uses the term "apparent" he does not mean to set
    it
    > in contrast with something "real" and non-apparent; he means to draw our
    > attention to the fact that it is our VIEW of the thing, and not the thing
    > itself, that counts in the action of the will. In this sense, the term
    > "apparent" is equivilent to the term "visible." That which falls
    outside
    > our view, therfore, has no effect on our mind.
    >
    > ...It would certainly preserve the mystery of the human soul, and it would
    > satisfy Edward's desire that we "speak in the old way as truly and
    properly
    > as ever," if we summaraized his teaching with this proposition: To say
    that
    > all mental events are determined is merely to say that whatever a man
    does,
    > he does for a reason.
    >
    > Those Edwards quotes were all from Freedom of the Will, as quoted in James
    > Carse
    > on-line (cool!): http://www.ccel.org/e/edwards/will/home.html
    >
    > more to come on Edwards' dynamic conception of God.
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
    > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 10 2003 - 01:54:05 BST