Re: MD James's inversion

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 18:47:08 BST

  • Next message: August West: "Re: MD Metaphysics of Quality: An oxymoron?"

    On 11 June 2003 1:47 PM Johnny writes:
    Johnny:
    Patterns are only held together by moral imperatives, and those moral
    imperatives are being erased - the very idea of a moral imperative is
    attacked, people feel moral imperatives should be destroyed because they are
    moral imperatives. The only reason men and women feel devotion and
    commitment to each other and love each other because it is moral to do so.

    Hi Johnny and all,

    I experience reality. I know reality.

    As a baby I learn. I create words. Words come from my experience of a
    dq-sq pattern. I have an instinctive sense of reality. For example my
    grandson experienced nursing for food. After a while he became vocal. He
    started making a sound 'hunah'. After a few repitions his mother realized
    that was his word for where his food came from.

    As I analyzed words created to describe a pattern of experience, I started
    with intuition, an instinctive sense of reality. In that analysis I
    realized that the word explained an aspect of the pattern I could only
    described as dq purpose. I act based on the purpose in the word. Only the
    'purpose' in the word enables my actions. 'Purpose' was not the only
    quality in the word.

    I do not jump on my horse and ride off in all directions! There is a dq
    quality of presence in the word. I call this dq quality existence.

    I spoke the word and another heard it, and knew what I meant. There is a dq
    quality being latched to an sq quality which can be repeated to represent
    the pattern. I call this dq quality 'quality.

    These three aspects of dq are indefinable, yet they are in a word. I have
    three different faculties to intuit the three different aspects. This is my
    experience of intuition, an instinctive sense of reality. IMO this is how
    MoQ is known.

    Now I am older I have more experience. I say 'I'. My DNA creates an
    awareness field arolund me, like a planet creates a gravitational field. In
    this awareness I place words of experience. I can analyze the pattern of
    the field itself. Have a mystical, artistic sense that can manipulate the
    words in my awareness field. I use analogy and meaphor. Mystically I
    create words with dq quality using patterns of my own existence and purpose.
    I create subjective experience to explain the objective. I create myself.
    IMO this is the basis for SOM.

    From instinctive experience there are patterns. They exist in moral orders.

    In my awareness field from my mystical, artistic sense "Patterns are only
    held together by moral imperatives, and those moral imperatives are being
    erased." I would rather say that my experience of existing orders from an
    instinctive sense are being crowded out by mystical, artistic
    representations. I have forgotten my intuitions. I am not educated to
    respect and remember them. Pirsig lives!

    "The only reason men and women feel devotion and commitment to each other
    and love each othe because it is moral to do so." I guess Geese have the
    same sense of morality.

    Joe

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 12 2003 - 18:45:09 BST