Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jun 18 2003 - 01:41:41 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD The Transformation of Love"

    Hi Sam,

    > Damasio distinguishes between "emotion" and "feeling" (I haven't followed
    > that distinction in previous posts, although I now shall). Damasio writes,
    > "I separate three stages of processing along a continuum: a state of
    > emotion, which can be triggered and executed nonconsciously; a state of
    > feeling, which can be represented nonconsciously; and a state of feeling
    > made conscious, ie known to the organism having both emotion and feeling."
    > So emotions are publicly observable (partly), whereas feelings are purely
    > internal. So let's agree that (defined this way) emotions are the level 2
    > processes, ie bodily, whereas feelings operate at level 3 and, I would
    > argue, at level 4, ie your sense that theory A is true and theory B is
    > false is a *feeling*. A DH Lawrence quote sums it up for me:
    >
    > You must fuse mind and wit with all the senses
    > before you can feel truth.
    > And if you can't feel truth you can't have any other
    > satisfactory sensual experience.
    >
    > (DH Lawrence, 'Sense of Truth')

    Aha. This separation of emotion from feeling is a breakthrough for me
    because as you may suspect I have doubts about the "emotional cognition"
    and "emotional wisdom" aspects of your eudaimonic 4th level. But the
    phrase 'sense of truth' puts what I think you may be driving at in a
    clearer light, at least for me, as perhaps best illustrated in the
    following passage from a book by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto simply entitled
    "Truth."

    "First, apprehension of the truth you feel is registered like an emotion
    and redeemed from subjectivism by its resemblance to instincts, such as
    alertness to danger, hunger and fear. When a creature in a flock, herd or
    pride signals an instinctive reaction to another, nobody thinks of
    accusing it of subjectivism. Some of the earliest attempts of human beings
    to match signs or language to their feelings must have been like that: an
    alarm or alert, and invitation to appease hunger or seek ease.
    Consciousness and communication transmute instincts into language which
    can be mistrusted; but the truth-telling mechanisms -- the inner feelings -
    - persists. We still have them and trust their promptings."

    That our sense of truth can be found at the 4th level is obvious because
    truth seeking is what that level is all about as opposed to the "can't we
    all just get along" demands of the level below where truth is manipulated
    in the interests of winning the game of king of the hill.

    But what strikes me most about this instinct for truth is its similarity
    to our instinct for Quality, that is, not only does it appeal to our
    better angels but it also exists at the front edge of experience as an
    immediate, intuitive, undeliberate, involuntary judgment. The conscious
    application of intellectual standards, criteria, precepts and rules come
    after the initial "feeling."

    It's hard to know just what to call this experience.The word "feeling" is
    too close to "emotion" for my liking. I might settle for "sense" as in
    "sixth sense" but I don't care for its suggestion of emanating from some
    area of the brain, and I despise the glove-fisted directive by politically
    correct types who like nothing better than to send you off to "sensitivity
    training."

    Suddenly I remembered part of poem by Wordsworth from my college days
    which I think strikes the right note:

    "One impulse from a vernal wood
    May teach you more of man
    Of moral evil and of good
    Than all the sages can.

    Yes, an impulse for truth. That sounds right. It also sounds right for
    Dynamic Quality because impulse suggests more than simple recognition, it
    suggests a force.

    Perhaps I've strayed too from your eudaimonic idea--from emotional wisdom
    to feeling to sense to impulse. In any event, if you'd care to comment I'd
    appreciate it. In the meantime, thanks for D. H. Lawrence quote that
    started me down this path.

    Platt
         

       

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 17 2003 - 01:40:59 BST