Re: MD myths and symbols

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Wed Jun 18 2003 - 12:19:50 BST

  • Next message: Scott R: "Re: MD myths and symbols"

    So, whether or not Pirsig has said as much, I think it is legitimate to say
    that the intellectual level *in humans* is less than 3000 years old. On the
    other hand, I would regard intellect (though perhaps needing a more
    grandiose term, like Logos) to have been "in existence" from the beginning,
    that all static patterns are in some sense "intellectual". If one doesn't
    want to go that far (it is kind of esoteric, to be sure), then one can say
    that it has been "around" all through the social level, but doesn't emerge
    as its own level until the Greeks.

    The implication of this is that it is only with its emergence in humans that
    we can see DQ operating in it, that is, to purposefully work and be creative
    on that level.

    - Scott

    Hello Scott,
    I have no idea where this confusion came from, but it appears to be deeply
    ingrained and has permeated the forum for quite some time. However, it must be
    put to rest, because it is quite simply incorrect.
    There is no contradiction in the quotes Paul has cited. The confusion is
    centred upon what happened when Intellectual values were changed in the Dynamic
    social institutions of ancient Greece.
    Intellectual patterns were exceptionally rich and varied well before ancient
    Greece, in Asia, China, India, and had been for so long that we have little
    idea how long. This must be understood.
    Ancient Greece tried to encapsulate social quality with intellectual
    patterns. That was the big move. Indian culture lives in harmony with its intellectual
    and social patterns. That is better i feel. It is the relationship between
    Social and Intellectual patterns that ancient Greece changed - no level sprang
    into existence or emerged suddenly like a howling wind in the night of thought.
    Indian thought gives more weight to DQ/SQ tension in all processes - there is
    no substance ontology, but there is process ontology. The Greeks gave us
    things and left us wondering what they do and what good they are!!!
    squonk

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 18 2003 - 12:21:20 BST