Re: MD novel/computer heirarchy

From: Valence (valence10@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 00:39:43 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD The Intellectual Level"

    Hey Johnny,

    J
    > 2. Instead of saying that all the patterns exist as intellectual patterns
    of
    > different levels, isn't it better to use the word consciousness or
    awareness
    > rather than intellect, thus avoiding having to use the confusing phrase
    > "intuitive intellect" to distinguish consciousness from enduring ideas,
    and
    > saving the term intellect to use for thoughts about society, thoughts only
    > possible after the establishment of the third level?

    R
    Agreed. Unless one concludes that "the intellectual level" is the same as
    the "intellectual" described in the 'pre/post intellectual' split (as Jon
    Marder does), or that "intellectual" is an inappropriate name for the 4th
    level entirely which is better called something else (like Sam's Eudemonia)
    than Pirsig's choice of terms creates a confusing equivocation over the term
    "intellectual". Choosing a replacement for either of these terms is a
    tricky business (especially with this group). As to your suggestions of
    consciousness and awareness, I don't like 'awareness' because it would
    reduce "pre/post-intellectual awareness" to simply "pre/post awareness" and
    that seems to convey the wrong message to me. "Pre-awareness" sounds like
    something you aren't even yet aware of (or some kind of psychic phenomenon)
    and I don't think that's quite right. It's not that you're "unaware" of
    what's on the "pre" side of the split, it's that you have yet to 'carve it
    up' in your mind. "Consciousness" might be a better term (ie.
    pre/post-conscious awareness), and seems to fit with Pirsig's idea of dreams
    as a widow on DQ (which alludes to when he discuss his 'Giant' dreams). But
    I would suggest replacing "pre/post-intellectual" with the term
    "pre/post-interpretational". I suggest that term based on the first
    paragraph of LILA, chapter 8, "...But we see subjects and objects as reality
    for the same reason we see the world right-side up although the lenses of
    our eyes actually present it to our brains upside down. We get so used to
    certain patterns of interpretation we forget the patterns are there." Now,
    instead of saying that there are 'intellectual patterns at different levels'
    we can say there are 'interpretive patterns at different levels'. Instead
    of saying that Quality is the 'pre-intellectual' cutting edge of reality, we
    can say it is the 'pre-interpretive cutting edge'. Instead of speaking of
    "pre-intellectual awareness" we can speak of "pre-interpretive awareness".
    What do you think?

    take care
    rick

    Imagination is the living power and prime agent of all human perception. -
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 17 2003 - 00:38:04 BST