Re: MD Intellectual patterns? huh?

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Thu Jul 24 2003 - 07:16:41 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD The Intellectual Level"

    Hi Joe
    On 21 July you said:

    Me from before:
    > "But all of these things are facets of the dynamical aspect of
    > existence-out of which Phaecrus picked 'the mother of them all'
    > QUALITY."
     
    Joe now:
    > Bo, you seem to accept the relativity of existence otherwise how
    > could existence be dynamic?

    "...accept the relativity of existence"? What do you mean?

    > It is not too far a stretch to accept the
    > relativity of purpose. For the inorganic order the source of movement
    > is gravity. For the organic order 'purpose' becomes a source of
    > movement beyond gravity and is relative when discussing movements in
    > the social or intellectual orders. Finally the relativity of
    > 'intellect' which embraces dynamic quality proper to the inorganic,
    > organic, social, and intellectual orders. The term I use to describe
    > this relativity of the 'intellect' is 'intuitive intellect' which
    > apprehends dynamic quality.

    I dare not answer until I understand. Please elaborate

    > And now to account for static quality, patterns, words. Let the fun
    > begin! It is easiest to say that static patterns are mine. I have an
    > awareness which can hold and manipulate static patterns. I have a
    > memory. My awareness is generated by my DNA and is not comparable to
    > a 'mind' or preexisting 'intellect and will' and other machines
    > necessary to abstraction and SOM. I propose an analogy that my
    > awarenss is like the gravity field generated by the earth. When I
    > communicate using static patterns, the listeners only trust what I am
    > saying. Only as a predator can I overcome the awareness of another
    > and directly influence actions. Pretty scary! Sentients, as
    > predators, are not new patterns.

    > Wiseacring with patterns in my awareness is my 'thinking intellect'.
    > "Yes, 'intuitive intellect' is an oxymoron." I had better find my
    > 'elephant gun'.

    As said, you may be saying something of profound importance, but
    what? No sarcasm. Give it another try.

    Sincerely.
    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 07:22:34 BST