From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 21:07:45 BST
> The MoQ says experience is primary, and it is of static quality.
I beg to differ. The MOQ says experience is primary and is synonymous
with Quality. Quality is then cut into Dynamic and static. Thus, pure
experience is both Dynamic and static simultaneously.
squonk: I agree with you Platt. Being you, i felt it was taken as read.
> Therefore, the most dynamic patterns will likely dominate static
> experience.
This doesn't follow from your previous assertion.
squonk: I can see that. And this is frustrating for me, because i want to
introduce an idea i have been thinking about, but really it should be presented
in an essay i have just about ready. An approach may lie in the relationship
between DQ and SQ, and this relationship is an aesthetic one.
I know you value aesthetics and beauty, in common with myself.
> As intellectual patterns are empirically verifiable as the
> most dynamic, (thus providing evidence for a hierarchy of evolutionary
> related patterns) it is intellectually patterned experience that a
> Metaphysics is concerned with.
Nor does this follow. At least, I can't make sense of it.
squonk: More frustration. But i have a feeling you would agree that static
inorganic patterns are evolving far more slowly, (less dynamically) than static
intellectual patterns? That's all i am saying really.
2.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 05 2003 - 21:24:23 BST