From: james marshall (edgarj@shaw.ca)
Date: Thu Aug 14 2003 - 13:37:32 BST
-------Original Message-------
From: moq_discuss@moq.org
Date: August 14, 2003 2:45:00 AM
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Subject: Re: MD Pirsig, Falck, and Wolfram
Hi folks, my name is Jim and this is my first posting here. In my
retirement I gave myself a project - to learn the history of western
philosophy. In "Lila" Pirsig suggests that the best way for me to do this
is to enter my project with some ideas of my own and then compare my ideas
with those of the philosophers I read. (can't read them all, not even all
the "great" ones - far as I can tell I only have one lifetime). He says that
I will find some that support me. He also says to be aware of being seduced
Philosophers are very persuasive people. I have found that my primary
idea is pretty sound in the face of the challenges to it. My idea? There
is no such thing as an object. I am now, in view of Buber's "I - Thou"
considering changing my idea to: "Live as if there is no such thing as an
object, all is subject." Yeah, I know, animistic.
Aha! Attitude. A metaphysics of attitude perhaps. An old friend told me:
Attitude is the key to everything. It felt right at the time. It still
does.
There is a word in Lila that Pirsig uses - mean (meanness). He uses it in
his attack against moralyzers. The character, Lila, uses it often.
Remember L'il Abner? Mammy Yokum said, "Good is better than evil because it
s nicer." That feels right too. There's some kind of an identity/unity
between Lila's and Mammy Yokum's attitude. It feels right. It feels good.
As Pirsig said in the last sentence of ZAMM, "You can sort of tell these
things."
>
>(Hi Lars - I'm a DQ party-pooper here, I believe "DQ" is used as a
>religious fudge factor to introduce subjective opinion into any discourse,
>as well as a 7th Calvary to weasel out of tight spots in arguments about
>the metaphysics. If you want to justify breaking a moral pattern, just
>cite "DQ" and you're all set. If something is contradictory or
>tautological, just cite "DQ" and your all set. I do see a role for
>something that can be called DQ in the creation of new patterns when
>existing patterns cross paths, but I see it as completely deterministic,
>its creations entirely the necessary result of other static patterns.)
>
Hi Johnny- sounds interesting. One thing that struck me reading 'Lila' is
that from the point of view of the static, social level of 'Quality',
disruption can come from either above or below; from 'Dynamic Quality' or
'the biological level.' It seems to me that an old Western (at least)
paradigm is to associate DQ and bQ; they are seen as one force, creative and
destructive, which exists in uneasy dialectic with the SQ of society. The
Freudian and post-Freudian id, for example. 'Lila' is apparently DQ, but it
is also the dance, the symbol of the bodily and erotic life.
Deterministic dynamism sounds more Stephen Wolfram-like to me.
By the way, are 'static' and 'dynamic' taken from Bergson?
LQ
_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 14 2003 - 13:39:01 BST