Re: MD Dealing with S/O pt 1

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:51:49 BST

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: Sheldrake (MD economics of want and greed 4)"

    Hi

    I'll buy that.

    DM
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:13 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Dealing with S/O pt 1

    > David,
    >
    > David said:
    > I suggest, we grab what we want, a non-essentialist Pirsig, and insist
    that's what he really is, so that we can gather as many people on the
    anti-essentialist side as we can. We are few enough. I never get this
    emphasising someone's errors thing. Are there any essentialists out there
    who fancy a discussion with the anti-essentialist faction? Pirsig certainly
    says a lot that is anti-essentialist I believe.
    >
    > Matt:
    > Well, the deal is, I have two intentions with Pirsig: I want to put
    Pirsig's best foot forward, but I also would like to know which foot Pirsig
    thinks he wants to put forward. I summed this difference in intention as
    being the difference between philosophy and biography. When I do philosophy
    with Pirsig, trust me, I always get ripped for "forgetting" certain passages
    in Pirsig. My reply is that when I'm philosophizing, I don't emphasize his
    errors. However, just as Rorty did some biography of Dewey in his "Dewey's
    Metaphysics", in which he critiqued Dewey's own retainment of the word
    "metaphysics", I would also like to do some scholarly biography on Pirsig.
    But, whereas Rorty thinks the spirit of Dewey's letter is firmly
    antiessentialist, I am not completely sure yet if the spirit of Pirsig's
    letter is firmly antiessentialist. It might take me many years of research
    and thinking to pull it apart to my own satisfaction.
    >
    > So, I am still going to hold off on calling the spirit of Pirsig's letter
    antiessentialism. I'm just not sure yet on this biographical issue.
    >
    > But, when I'm philosophizing, don't doubt that I could give a rat's ass as
    to if Pirsig thought of himself as essentialist or not. I've been carrying
    on a discussion with the essentialist camp and pointing out his
    antiessentialist passages for a year. Doesn't seem to help though.
    >
    > Matt
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:57:32 BST