Re: MD Evolution of levels

From: Yale Landsberg (yale_landsberg@yalelands.com)
Date: Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:43:54 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Evolution of levels"

    No problem. It was not written for dabblers like you, but rather explorers
    like Patrick. yale
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <abahn@comcast.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:48 AM
    Subject: Re: MD Evolution of levels

    > Hi Yale,
    >
    > Thanks, but I'd rather take the easy way out. :-)
    >
    > Andy
    > > From: <abahn@comcast.net>
    > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:33 AM
    > > Subject: Re: MD Evolution of levels
    > >
    > >
    > > > Hi Yale,
    > > >
    > > > I have read your paper. Or more honestly skimmed it. You seem to
    want
    > > someone
    > > > on the list to confirm your belief that there is a connection between
    > > Pirsig and
    > > > your paper (fractal philosophy). Why don't you just tell us about the
    > > > connection instead of making us needlessly wait in suspense.
    > > >
    > > > merely suggesting,
    > > > Andy
    > > >
    > >
    > > Hi Andy, the Fractal Philosophy paper at http://yalelands.com/frph.pdf
    is
    > > meant to be read and commented upon by professional and amateur
    philosophers
    > > willing to bet some time (expend their to to hopefully get some
    worthwhile
    > > reward.)
    > >
    > > And I am sugesting that there is a lot in it about some interest aspects
    of
    > > hierarchies of levels and levels of hierarchies.
    > >
    > > Rather than keep you in suspense about where it might be sympatico with
    MoQ,
    > > permit me to reference comments by one of your memebers who actually
    took
    >
    > > the time to read and reflect upon it, instead of looking for the easy
    way
    > > out....
    > >
    > > Dear Yale,
    > >
    > > It was yours, the article? Then my apologies for my harsh comment at the
    > > beginning at the post about 'the author'. Uhm, let me put it more mildly
    > > what I said: the old Greek philosophers used this dialogue-technique, in
    > > which it was true that the writer assumed rather naieve and 'stupid'
    > > commenters. The technique you used addresses the reader directly, which
    > > has the advantage that it can create a more personal touch, but in many
    > > cases I did't assume the stance you ascribed to your potential readers.
    > > And true, the recurring suggestions about the assumed stance of the
    > > reader kind of irritated me (which left the reader stupid and the author
    > > smart!). Anyhow, your style of writing was original and playful. Thus,
    > > the attempt had DQ, but the it didn't lead (in my humble opinion) to a
    > > static quality-form it potentially could have.
    > > ;-)
    > >
    > > All the best, Patrick.
    > >
    > >
    > > And...
    > >
    > >
    > > Dear YL,
    > >
    >
    > > The pdf-file was interesting, although the ego-blown style of the author
    > > irritated me. It does have similarities with Pirsig seeing Lila. In the
    > > café he notices she notices that he is watching her, and she notices
    > > that he notices that she notices he is watching her, etc. ad infinitum.
    > > Like standing between two mirrors, you have a reflection of a reflection
    > > of a reflection. The fellow of this pdf-file applies a similar strategy.
    > >
    > > Two things I found particularly interesting:
    > > The first is that he uses a mathematical metaphor of the seemingly ease
    > > of going away from a spot: Any direction is adequate, north, west, south
    > > or inbetween. Finding a good alternative narrows you options
    > > considerably, however. The place you want to go is either north or south
    > > or another particular direction. What Pirsig says about the
    > > hippie-movement is that the hippies were good at walking away from the
    > > center of the western culture of the sixties- they didn't, however, know
    >
    > > where to turn to. That's why the movement virtually bleeded to death.
    > >
    > > The second thing I found interesting was the notion of aming at turning
    > > towards turning towards something. It has a relation with the concept
    > > of free will. What does it mean to turn your attention to something (to
    > > will something)? In order to do that, you have to change your thinking
    > > from this to that (to the topic you want to focus on). And how do you
    > > initiate this change? By accelareting from some zero-point, so that you
    > > can accomplish an amount of changing your attention. But how do you
    > > start to accelerate? By starting to accelerate you acceleration. This
    > > leads to an obvious paradox. How is it ever possible to turn your
    > > attention towards something? How is free will possible? (This is a
    > > version of psychology's homunculi, by the way)
    > >
    > > The notion of a fractal philosophy is quite big and interesting.
    > > Relating such a big idea to the whole edifice of the MoQ seems to me
    >
    > > daunting. Nevertheless interesting. Maybe cartesian philosophy (SOM)
    > > tries to zoom in on a fractal- hoping someday to see the ultimate
    > > building blocks! Pirsig would say: Hey, you're just going in one
    > > possible direction. There are others, not only by 'zooming in' but by
    > > staying at one level and walk around there, or better: zoom in a bit but
    > > going to the 'left' simultanously. (Fits into another metaphor of
    > > Pirsig: His idea of a chaqautua meaning to deepen the riverpaths of our
    > > behaviors, instead of creating new ones only to end up in one shallow
    > > homogenous river.)
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:48:33 BST