Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: abahn@comcast.net
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:46:35 BST

Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD Four options"

Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SOM's ambiguities--an opening for the MOQ"
Maybe in reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
Next in thread: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Mark,

You said: "If the proper MoQ is that enjoying high social approval, then i can
identify the proper MoQ at this moment in time. My wish is not to challenge, but
to work with it. I do that because the MoQ, as i understand it, is good. I
reject interpretations because they are not so nearly as good, as i see them."

Andy: Your clarification helps. I agree wholeheartedly with the above. I think
this is the proper aproach to take. :-)

Thanks for being patient with me,
Andy

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD Four options"
Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SOM's ambiguities--an opening for the MOQ"
Maybe in reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
Next in thread: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:47:20 BST