Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: Dan Glover (daneglover@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 27 2003 - 02:36:17 BST

  • Next message: abahn@comcast.net: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"

    Hello everyone

    >From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >Subject: Re: MD Dealing with S/O
    >Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:55:06 EDT
    >
    >In a message dated 9/26/03 2:54:00 PM GMT Daylight Time,
    >daneglover@hotmail.com writes:
    >
    >
    > > Hi Mark
    > >
    > > Did Bo really assert that? Personally, I find a lot of value in Bo's
    >SOLAQI,
    > >
    > > just as I find value in Sam Norton's eudaimonic MOQ and in Doug
    >Renselle's
    > > Quantonics website, but there is only one author of the proper MOQ. I am
    > > quite sure Bodvar knows that too.
    > >
    > > Dan
    > >
    > >
    >
    >Hi Dan,
    >Thanks for your reply.
    >If the matter were not so clearly stated by Bo himself i would agree with
    >your last sentence. However, examination reveals a number of occasions, and
    >posts
    >to numerous individuals, that Bo has repeatedly insisted, barring copywrite
    >protection, that he (Bo) would be regarded as the author of the 'proper
    >MoQ.'
    >I am pleased you find value in Bo's work and that of many others; I find
    >value in them myself. Sadly, i do not feel Bo helps the promotion of the
    >MoQ by
    >making what are generally considered to be outrageous claims regarding his
    >own
    >views and ideas.
    >Speaking as one who sincerely wishes for the MoQ to help others, as i feel
    >it
    >has helped me, i cannot but help feeling frustrated surveying the damaging
    >consequences of Bo's contribution in recent years.

    Hi Mark

    I find your reasoning here contradictory so I'm unsure how seriously to take
    your words. You say you find value in Bo's work yet you also state he makes
    outrageous claims, generally considered, that is. I happen to have read just
    about every one of Bodvar's posts over the years and I don't consider any of
    his claims to be outrageous or damaging. If I might be so bold to inquire,
    who is it that is doing the general considering? Is there a MOQ general
    considering committee that I am unaware of?

    Dan

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month. Limited time offer--
    sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 27 2003 - 02:37:28 BST