From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Sep 28 2003 - 02:14:23 BST
Paul, Bo and y'all:
Bo said:
Intellect an aspect
of mind?! But as Q-intellect is a static aspect of DQ, it means that
MIND = DQ and THAT one I buy!
To counter Bo, Paul quoted from ZAMM:
"And finally: Phædrus, following a path that to his knowledge had never
been taken before in the history of Western thought, went straight
between the horns of the subjectivity-objectivity dilemma and said
Quality is neither a part of mind, nor is it a part of matter. It is a
third entity which is independent of the two."
dmb says:
Things don't change much when we get to the MOQ either. If there were an
encyclopedia, everything in it could be described in terms of subject and
objects or in terms of static patterns BUT DQ can't be described in any of
those terms, except to say that it is not them. Mind is in that book. Ideas
about DQ could fit, but DQ itself cannot. Its like FM radio, there's no
staic at all.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 28 2003 - 02:12:57 BST