RE: MD MoQ platypuses

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 00:33:45 BST

  • Next message: james marshall: "RE: MD Dealing with S/O"

    Sam and all MOQers;

    dmb had said that "Pirsig wrote Lila because too many ZAMM readers were left
    with the impression that Quality is just whatever we like."

    Sam axed:
    Doesn't Pirsig go into some depth about your last sentence, and the ways in
    which it's both true and false? It's amazing that you come out with that
    line!!

    dmb answers with lines from Chapter 6,

    "Rigel vigorouly soaped the warm wash cloth... He thought the Great Author's
    respectful readers should have seen him last night dancing with Lila. They
    probably wouldn't have minded though. Among HIS respectful readers
    drunkenness and whoring were probably considered some form of "Quality".

    Later Rigel says:
    "You made a statement in your book that everyone knows and agrees to what
    'Quality"is. Obviously everyone does not! You refused to define 'Quality',
    thus preventing any arguments on the subject. You tell us that
    'dialecticians who debate these matters are scoundrels. I guess that would
    include lawyers too. That's pretty good. You carefully tie your critics
    hands and feet so they cannot give you any opposition, tar their reputations
    for good measure, and then you say'ok, come out and fight'. Very brave. Very
    brave."

    The author replies:
    "May I come out and fight? My exact statement was that people DO disagree as
    to what Quality is, but their disagreements is only on the objects in which
    they think Quality inheres." Rigel asks, "What's the difference?" The author
    says, "Quality, on which there is complete agreement, is a universal source
    of things. The objects about which people disagree are merely transitory."

    Rigel says, "WHAT universal source of things? ...By the way, how do you keep
    in touch with that marvelous 'universal source of things'? Do you have some
    sort of special radio set? Hmmm? How do you keep in touch. ... I'm waiting
    to hear. How do you keep in touch with Quality?"

    "There are answers," the author finally said, "but I don't think I can give
    them all to you this morning." ...

    With deep gravity Rigel says, "Please will you, in future days, consider the
    possiblity that the 'Great Source of All Things', that speakds only to you
    and not to me, is, like so many of your ideas, just a figment of yourown
    fertile imagination, a figment that allows you to justify any act of your
    own immorality as somehow God-given, I consider that undefined 'Quality' to
    be a very dangerous commodity. Its the stuff fools and fanaics are made of."

    "In the practice of law we come into contact with a fair-sixed number of
    people who do not share traditional moral values, but feel rather that what
    is good and what is bad is a matter of their own independent judgement. Does
    that sound familiar? Well, we give them a name," Rigel continued, "We call
    them criminals."

    "One of the things that angered me most about your book (ZAMM) was its
    appearance at a time when so many young people all over the country put
    themselves above the law with criminal acts - draft dodgers, arsonists,
    political trators, revolutionists, even ASSASSINS, all of them justifying
    themselves with the belief that they alone can see this God-given truth that
    no one else can see. You talked for chapter after chapter about how to
    preserve the underlying form of a motorcycle, but you didn't say a single
    word about how to preserve the underlying form of society. And so your book
    may have been a big seller among some of these radicals and cult groups who
    are looking for that sort of thing. They're looking for anything that will
    justify their doing as they please. And you gave them support. You gave them
    encouragement. I've no doubt that your intentions were good, but whatever
    your intentions may have been it was the devil's work you were doing."

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 29 2003 - 00:32:28 BST