Re: MD Truth

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Mon Oct 20 2003 - 22:00:28 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Truth"

    Quality as the sum of static and dynamic qualities, of course. Dynamical
    quality must be leading, and forms perhaps a large part of the Quality
    Act (so to say) in the making of a choice. E.g. deciding a new project
    for your work, a subject for a next paper to write, or which job you
    want to apply for. Once you have distilled a good static quality
    foundation to build upon, you're tempted to stick to this original
    static quality when you're working it out. Too much DQ in this process
    of 'working out' might undo or deconstruct your project. On the other
    hand there is the danger that you create an Ivory tower and shield
    effectively all dynamic quality out of it.

    Very much abstract talk... Maybe that's what Rorty doesn't find
    interesting or even worthwile in philosophy anymore, philosophy as the
    process of a continual refreshion of old abstract conceptions only to
    see these same conceptions anew again and again. Anyhow this abstract
    thinking might be worthwile after all, to me, if the fruit of DQ has
    brought forward a Good static quality, if after and before that more
    pragmatic action is being pursued. Balance (between thinking and action,
    between relativism and absolutism) is what it's all about. (Note to
    Rorty-defenders and Rorty-attackers here, I'm just talking out loud in
    my own way and do not pretend to represent in any way what Rorty stands
    or does not stand for).

    Greetings, Patrick.

    Hi Patrick,
    You indicate two aspects here i feel: 1. A balance between SQ and SQ, and 2.
    A relationship between DQ and coherence. The first may describe how, when and
    where DQ operates, and the second may describe the evolution of one's life
    experience.
    This being so, Rorty may be encapsulated in this formula. I do not discount
    the possibility that this formula may be encapsulated by Rorty, but as Rorty
    does not use a value lead metaphysical framework, i should need a great deal of
    convincing before valuing it.
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 20 2003 - 22:04:07 BST