Re: MD Truth

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 20:15:38 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Truth (rational enquiry)"

    Matt
    For Heidegger the point is that you un-cover rather than re-cover as you
    say.
    The point addresses the fact that you can make any sense of experience,
    this is somewhat surprising. The point is that SOM sets up a false kind of
    distance
    between subject and object (only here can you talk about representation),
    Quality refers to the unity prior to SOM, and therefore Heidegger's notion
    of
    truth is in this context rather than a representation context. It is
    pre-distancing
    rather than within SOM distancing.

    regards
    David M
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:36 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Truth

    > David,
    >
    > David said:
    > Heidegger calls truth aletheia. Which is to uncover or reveal, where
    lethe=the river of forgetting, so that truth is to remember, or to reunite
    what has been alienated from each other, i.e. overcoming what SOM has torn
    apart, or in Pirsig Quality=truth, so that quality contains/brings together
    subject and object as not separate.
    >
    > Matt:
    > Rorty, I think rightly, hates that Greek conception of truth, truth as
    unveiling. Truth as Platonic anamnesis is one of the formulations of
    representationalism for Rorty, and I can't say that I disagree.
    >
    > If its a historical process, like if the West was obliterated tomorrow and
    in 2,000 years the East began digging up our artifacts and trying to
    recreate Western life, then of course there's no problem with aletheia. But
    that's certainly not what it meant for Plato. Plato meant that there was a
    Form of various things (like the Pythagorean theorem) and we should uncover
    it, remember it, and that would be the Truth. I don't know Heidegger well
    enough to know how he appropriates it, but I think its a rhetorical stretch
    if he simply meant something like "overcoming what SOM has torn apart." Why
    not say "recover" then?
    >
    > Matt
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 22 2003 - 20:28:28 BST