Re: MD Two theories of truth

From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 01:09:26 GMT

  • Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD What makes an idea dangerous?"

    Paul,

    Paul said:
    The statement about Native American vision quests was intended to refute the claim that mystic reality (Dynamic Quality) is equivalent to intersubjective agreement, not to say something about a discussion of mystic reality.

    Matt:
    Well, A) I said 'intersubjective agreement' was more or less the same as 'Quality,' not 'Dynamic Quality' and B) if you except my "poor terminology", I still don't see much wrong with the equivalency. 'Quality' includes both Dynamic and static Quality. A person's indiosyncracies can be considered Dynamic and the more those indiosyncracies become shared, the more the Dynamic becomes static.

    Paul said:
    Low Quality-as-such for one level of patterns is high Quality-as-such for another, a feeling that would be verified as real by any adulterer.

    Matt:
    So--what? We are supposed to respect the adulterer? Tell that to every person whose been cheated on. I doubt you'll get much sympathy. Or verification.

    Matt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 01:22:00 GMT