From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 05:34:16 GMT
DM,
> Scott:
> Carter makes the point that the L of CI differs from Hegel's dialectic
logic
> (thesis, antithesis, synthesis) in that in the L of CI there is no
> possibility of synthesis.
>
> DM: Interesting post, I like your approach. But, by the way,
> Hegel never talks about synthesis, only his interpreters do. And
> what follows antithesis is a move on to another level, so not
> so very different.
Ok, then the L of CI differs from Hegel in that the former is used when one
cannot resolve the contradiction by moving to another level. Note that I am
only saying they are different, not that one is better than the other. They
each, along with Aristotelian logic, would be used when appropriate.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 05:51:44 GMT