From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 19:20:43 GMT
Scott,
Sure, Rorty calls himself a nominalist, but, I claim, it is a bit different then what you refer to as nominalist. We've been around that loop before and I simply wanted to refer to the fact that, as far as I can tell, we both still disagree as to whether Rorty is a nominalist in your sense, or whether the nominalist is led to such consequences as you think.
Matt
p.s. Did you notice that Platt outed us? "It's should be clear to all by now that Scott and Matt do not agree with one of the key principles of the MOQ." My, my what shall we do? Besides dispute Platt's grasp of what Pirsig is saying, like David and Rick did. But God help us that we should disagree with famous authors!
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 20:04:44 GMT