Re: MD The Cutting Edge & Intellect

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Thu Nov 20 2003 - 15:36:32 GMT

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Cutting Edge & Intellect"

    Mark you wrote:

    Mark 19-11-03: For your benefit: We must make a distinction between: 1.
    Art
    (Dynamic). 2. The (static) products of Art. Thus, Intellect in motion is
    a
    Dynamic artistic activity, while the static repertoire from which new
    art is
    created is the sum total of all previous Dynamic intellectual activity.
    Truth is part of the static repertoire, and it is an Artistic creation,
    like
    subjects and objects.

    Mark
    The other night I was watching "Lawrence of Arabia" one of my favorite
    films. I was reminded by the scene with the train of Pirsig's own talk
    about the cutting edge of reality being the cutting edge of the train.
    That cutting edge of reality has been on my mind lately. I agree that
    art products may become static, but that is not Art itself.

    Mark 20-11-03: We agree on that!

    The cutting edge of reality is changing and dynamic in nature. Art, truth,
    morality
    and quality exist on that cutting edge.

    Mark 20-11-03: Truth is always static. They change, even Euclidean geometry
    is not truthful in all circumstances.

    By the time we get to it intellectually, the train has gone on by, unless we
    take life as
    existing on the cutting edge of reality. Unfortunately I don't believe
    we, as humans, have the capacity to do that for very long if at all.

    Mark 20-11-03: It's not easy to maintain the cutting edge, but Native
    American Indians do rather well, and flashes of insight produce evolve static
    patterns.

    Intellect also can't survive on that edge, it's a static pattern.

    Mark 20-11-03: Intellect does not sit idle and still, it moves and creates.
    When it creates it is responding to DQ, and when it does not it is composed of
    a static repertoire of patterns. I tried to spell this out in 'The edge of
    chaos' because i think it's what Pirsig says when you examine Lila.

    However the value might be that we can intellectually support the values
    that can help us recognize that edge. I was thinking about the process
    of art, often I believe it is the artist interpretation of that edge
    that is communicated through their work. I remember being in an art
    museum in Europe once and there was a small exhibit of just blank
    canvasses from various well known artist. At first I though, "Yeah
    right, who is kidding us here, this isn't art." Now I understand that
    they were all experiencing the same value of the same cutting edge. That
    moment right before the process begins of creating. Pirsig wasn't really
    that clear on the subject other than writing, "Finally there's a fourth
    Dynamic morality which isn't a code. I suppose you could call it "Code
    of Art" or something like that, but art is usually though of as such a
    frill that the title undercuts its importance." I still am not sure what
    the "Code of Art" exactly is but perhaps it is all related to that edge.
    Just a thought.
    Mati

    Hi Mati,
    The code of art Pirsig refers to is largely Eastern in flavour and too
    confined and restricted by Western notions of Art. That may be why he did not wish
    to use it in Lila as your quote indicates, because the Western conception of
    art is static. The Eastern conception is living; the Cook and his knife - the
    Tao - Quality.
    I only really got onto this myself in recent years so please be patient -
    when the 'penny drops' you are going to be in for a very pleasant and satisfying
    Aaaaaaahhh! moment. :-) You may like to take a peak at Northrop's 'The meeting
    of East and West' - a long book, but an easy read with a few eye openers
    along the way. And read, 'The master butcher' at the beginning of 'The edge of
    chaos' on the MoQ.org?

    In the West, intellect has for its creations the SoM mythos and truth. In the
    East, the mythos is more artistic and closer to Quality i feel. Now we all
    have the MoQ, which places Dynamic Quality as the source of everything, and
    static products as works of Art.

    I think Pirsig was clear upon this, but he was ostensible in his approach -
    he indicated through example - we all read ZMM and Lila, and if that wasn't an
    artistic experience then what was? ;-)

    All the best,
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 20 2003 - 15:37:28 GMT