RE: MD Democracy in the MOQ

From: Mati Palm-Leis (mpalm@merr.com)
Date: Mon Dec 01 2003 - 03:15:37 GMT

  • Next message: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Democracy in the MOQ"

    David and all,

    David, thanks for taking the time to create a line of thinking on this
    topic.

    Two thoughts came to mind as I went through it.

    First you wrote: So a long period of social and cultural evolution is
    required before anything like genuine Democracy. By analogy, the
    neo-cons think they can turn a 10 year old boy into a 50 year old man
    over night simply by holding a gun to his head and demanding that he
    "grow up right now!"

    Mati: I agree with your analogy, but I think it raises an important
    question about what the intellectual levels is. I believe that you were
    alluding to the point that "intellect" in our human capacity is
    developmental in its nature and its ability to latch on to it as a value
    system or level. In literal terms of the intellectual level the ten year
    Iraqi old boy would not have the capacity to intellectually to
    understand democracy from his cultural point of reference. And
    literally the 50 year old Iraqi would have the difficulty to learning to
    understand the meaning of democracy. (The old dog, new trick issue) So
    the question is how to define intellect as a developmental process?
    What needs to be taught to create "intellect"? And of course our
    favorite question what is intellectual level?

    Second: I tend not to be partisan in my political thinking, though I can
    be fairly liberal as a whole in my thinking process. I thought your
    comment "This is why his comparison of Hitler and Bush is so compelling"
    was a bit of a stretch in my mind. Sure we can question some the social
    values and perhaps an intellectual value or two that Bush leads by, but
    as a whole it doesn't make him a Fascist. There is the Political Yoke
    that forces him to be accountable politically and democratically. To be
    honest this really is new historical ground in that we have invaded a
    nation to in the final analysis to democratize in the name of
    geo-political stability (Yes, I know the party line is WMD, is the
    reason we went in. Saddam created a living ghost, WMD, which became a
    dangerous reality after 9/11. And this is a legitimate threat whether
    real or a ghost), We did this after WWII through the occupation of
    Germany and Japan. But culturally on the social level and intellectually
    level there seemed to be more to work with. A work that took several
    years, I think it took better than 20 years, to accomplish. Iraq
    represents a new ball game in that respect because I don't think there
    will be 20 years to make happen. Then there is the issue of whether it
    is right for us to try to instill a democracy in this nation? I think
    it would take 20 years to find out but politics and history don't
    provide the rational to stay in the game that long, even if it were for
    the right reason.

    DMB: I think attitude exactly mirrors what is happening right now before
    our
    eyes. The current administration sold the war in Iraq on the premise
    that
    there was an imminent threat, that Iraq was poised to kill millions of
    Americans and those who dared to question or criticize were painted as
    not
    only unpatriotic, but as people who "hate" America, as giving aid and
    comfort to the enemy. .....

    Mati: This tends to be, in my mind, somewhat of an unfair generalization
    that happened on both sides of the fences. I am interested what the
    middle of the road has to say. They represent the Political Keel that
    keeps democracy afloat socially and intellectually and keeps it from
    tipping over into the abyss.

    DMB:
    Be afraid. Be very afraid. And if you don't vote for the Democrat next
    fall,
    you're obviously unpatriotic and hate America. ;-) Thanks again for your
    time, dear reader.

    Mati: To vote based on fear is not a "quality vote". Vote based on
    "intellectual" informed understanding of the issues and what it means to
    our society is far better. However if DMB is right, then you would
    surely vote Republican, if Bush and the Republicans made the mess then
    let them clean it up.... or if historically this was really the right
    move then give them the credit. We would learn an interesting lesson
    either way. ;)

    Take care
    Mati

     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 01 2003 - 03:16:34 GMT