From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:23:17 GMT
It APPEARS that a choice related to "homosexual" partner vs. "heterosexual"
partner would be social rather than biological since the same choice
dynamics operate within the same sex/gender choices.
Modern science has changed the capabilities of the biological human to
reproduce without heterosexual intercourse.
Further, heterosexual intercourse is moving to the status of uncool (low
social value) low-tech (your father's Oldsmobile). Sexual relations might
be more appropriately called genital recreation and something closer to
mutual masturbation and gender is not relevant from a biological
perspective.
What might be the motivation behind procreation? What will drive DNA
selection in the near future, biological or social issues?
What will be the evolution/devolution of couple committed relationships?
Obsolescence? How about monogamy vs. polygamy? Maybe a new institution i.e.
Domestic LLC that would support security, "group gropes" and property rights
passing after death. Would that be different than a cult or a tribe or is
it all semantics?
Pax et bene,
Walt
_\/\/ _/-\ |_ -|-_
~~~_/)~~~
Hi Walt,
Sorry mate, but i am a damn old romantic when it comes to this sort of thing,
and i believe in love. Anything else lacks Quality.
I had toyed with writing an MoQ Utopia novel - there would be described
massive group gropes held in cavernous orange inflatable tents filled with a
narcotic flavoured atmosphere. But Steely Dan will probably write about that before
i get to it? ;)
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:32:59 GMT