From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 16:30:25 GMT
In a message dated 12/17/03 1:18:04 AM GMT Standard Time,
peterson.steve@verizon.net writes:
> Also, so that I don't offend Mark and perhaps others again, not
> that saying that our sexuality is socially rather than biologically latched
> makes it no more of a choice than it would be if it were biologically
> latched. Changing our sexuality would be literally changing our
> personalities. I predict that we will never isolate "the gay gene."
>
Hi Steve,
I agree with you.
I like your use of the term personality here, it makes sense to me. Many
homosexual males look biologically like hard nosed, salt of the Earth dock hands
but behave with the personality of a warm and affectionate woman.
Personality, for me, is the intertwining of a great deal of biological and
social value evolution - and where they may diverge in one coherence, we may
attach an indicator such as gay. I am thinking aloud here!
Thanks for taking my feelings into consideration Steve, but i was in a foul
mood the day i sounded off, and it is i who need to act with more
consideration.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 17 2003 - 16:32:48 GMT