Re: MD Capture of a Tyrant

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 17:08:45 GMT

  • Next message: Erin N.: "RE: MD Capture of a Tyrant"

    Hi Platt,
     
    >> You seem to be properly angered by liberal political correctness, but have
    >> no sensitivity for the conservative version of the same.
    >
    > I define liberal political correctness as the attempt to prevent anyone
    > from saying anything that someone else might be offended by. The means of
    > prevention is the establishment of "speech codes" whereby someone who
    > violates the code is punished by expulsion from the group, by fines, by
    > forced attendance at "sensitivity training" seminars and by other means of
    > individual liberty deprivation.
    >
    > I await to be enlightened as to the conservative version of the same.

    We don't have to agree to one another's definitions of political
    correctness. Let me try again.

    Can you agree to the immorality of playing "social level power games" for
    deciding who has "enough status to exclude whom from the discussion"? I find
    it immoral when liberals do it by demanding that to participate in
    discussion and avoid labels of "racist," 'homophobe", etc, you must first
    master the "speech codes." But I also find it immoral when conservatives
    demand conformity to their standards for discourse at the threat of such
    labels as "unpatriotic" and "un-American."

    Both cases amount to ad hominem attacks. Rather than arguing ideas
    intellectually, too often both camps choose the tactic of excluding the
    other side from discussion based on social acceptability of views. Both are
    putting social restrictions on the market place of ideas. Shouldn't we be
    working for a free market to allow intellectual patterns to flourish?

    In your letter to the editor, you said:
    "It's high time you liberals got a taste of your own medicine. You don't
    like being called unpatriotic? Tough. Those who live by name-calling die
    by name-calling."

    I don't understand why an intellectual would defend conservative
    name-calling. Wouldn't it be better for liberals and conservatives both to
    avoid name-calling?

    Thanks,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 17 2003 - 17:43:11 GMT