From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Sat Dec 20 2003 - 21:51:18 GMT
Hi Wim,
> Steve asked 16 Dec 2003 18:59:00 -0500:
> 'Could you explain what static patterns "migrating towards DQ" means to you?
> ... Are static patterns static or not?'
>
Wim quoted:
>The increase in versatility is directed
> toward Dynamic Quality. The increase in power to control hostile forces is
> directed toward static quality. Without Dynamic Quality the organism cannot
> grow. Without static quality the organism cannot last. Both are needed.'
Thanks, Wim. To clarify, could you give an example of a pattern that is
more versatile than another? Would I be correct in saying that versatility
is an openness to dynamic improvement? Could I interpret 'static patterns
migrating towards DQ' as meaning that newer patterns tend to be better than
older ones?
The statement 'static patterns "migrating towards DQ' sounds to me like
static patterns become closer and closer to being DQ which makes no sense to
me, since I think of the dynamic/static quality distinction as un-patterned
(undefined)/patterned (definable) experience. I can see no middle ground
for patterns to be more or less "patterned" though your descriptions of
patterns in terms of stability and versatility make sense to me (assuming I
have it right above.)
Thanks,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 20 2003 - 21:51:08 GMT