RE: MD intellectual level

From: Dan Glover (daneglover@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2004 - 18:41:48 GMT

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD intellectual level"

    Hello everyone

    >From: <ant.mcwatt@ntlworld.com>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >Subject: MD intellectual level
    >Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 15:42:00 +0000
    >
    >Re: The intellectual level
    >
    >Bo said:
    >
    >We know what philosophers Pirsig refers to in his work and (your)
    >Whitehead, Bergson, Heidegger are not among them. And if existentialism can
    >be said to be a parallel or forerunner for the MOQ ...maybe?
    >
    >Matt said:
    >
    >Pirsig does refer flatteringly to Whitehead in his reference to Whitehead's
    >"dim apprehension" and I thought Pirsig referenced Bergson once (possibly
    >in his line-up of philosophers that other people said he sounded like).
    >
    >Ant:
    >
    >I also thought Pirsig made a direct reference to Bergson but it isn’t in
    >ZMM, SODV or LILA.

    Hi Matt and Anthony

    Robert Pirsig mentions Bergson in Lila's Child, note #126:

    "I think this conclusion undermines the MOQ, although that is obviously not
    Platt’s
    intention. It is like saying that science is really a form of religion.
    There is some truth to
    that, but it has the effect dismissing science as really not very important.
    The MOQ is in
    opposition to subject-object metaphysics. To say that it is a part of that
    system which it
    opposes sounds like a dismissal. I have read that the MOQ is the same as
    Plato, Aristotle,
    Plotinus, Hegel, James, Peirce, Nieztsche, Bergson, and many others even
    though these
    people are not held to be saying the same as each other. This kind of
    comparison is what I
    have meant by the term, “philosophology.” It is done by people who are not
    seeking to
    understand what is written but only to classify it so that they don’t have
    to see it as any
    thing new. God knows, the MOQ has never had two better friends than Bo and
    Platt, so
    this is no criticism of their otherwise brilliant thinking. It’s just that I
    see a lowering of
    the quality of the MOQ itself if you follow this path of subordinating it to
    that which it
    opposes."

    Dan

    _________________________________________________________________
    Worried about inbox overload? Get MSN Extra Storage now!
    http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 18:54:18 GMT