Re: MD Buddhism and the MOQ

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Sun Jan 18 2004 - 14:33:41 GMT

  • Next message: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD When is a metaphysics not a metaphysics?"

    Dear Khoo,

    In your 24 Dec 2003 22:44:51 +0800 e-mail you reformulate 'killing all
    intellectual patterns' in order to reach enlightenment into 'releasing' or
    'detaching from' all static patterns and you equate nirvana/enlightenment
    with Dynamic Quality.
    I don't understand how you can call both static quality (static patterns of
    value) and Dynamic Quality 'neutral' if your goal is to be released from
    static patterns of value and realise Dynamic Quality.

    For me both sq and DQ are aspects of 'Quality', so not 'neutral'. My goal is
    not to be released from static patterns of value, but to contribute to their
    migration towards DQ. I choose 'attachment' to progressively more versatile
    patterns of value. There's not point in escaping the world of patterns of
    value (of Quality), because there's nothing to escape to. DQ is an aspect of
    Quality (and of patterns of value) and not something outside them where you
    can migrate to. Only the patterns themselves can 'migrate to DQ', i.e.
    change their sq/DQ balance.

    You seem to disagree with the goal I described as creating 'intellectual
    patterns of value that constitute a more collective "self": identification
    with humanity and "creation" as a whole'. The quote from Einstein with which
    you end expresses the same goal for me however:
    'A human being is a part of the whole, called by us "Universe," a part
    limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings
    as something separated from the rest - a kind of optical delusion of his
    consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to
    our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us.
    Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle
    of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its
    beauty.'

    N.B. Einstein doesn't describe 'the whole' as a prison from which we should
    free ourselves. It is our sense of being separate from that 'whole' that
    emprisons us. Buddhism can be interpreted as propagating exactly the
    opposite: detachment from that 'whole'.

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 18 2004 - 14:37:23 GMT