From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Feb 08 2004 - 15:20:09 GMT
Hi David M,
>A Britney fan may discover the pleasures of Mozart
> some day, but a Mozart fan is somewhat unlikely to convert
> to the musical pleasures of Britney. To appreciate Mozart
> is to reach a higher level of musical sophitication than to
> appreciate Britney. I say this with a musical taste that ranges
> from the Clash to Led Zeppelin to Mozart to Wagner. Despite
> the enthusiam for the first two I can see them fading from the cultural
> consciousness whilst the latter two remain.
Speaking of long-lasting musical excellence (Mozart) compared to
contemporary popularity (Britney), Charles Murray in his book "Human
Achievement" comes up with the following ranking of greats in Western
music according to the experts (in descending order):
Beethoven
Mozart
J.S. Bach
Wagner
Hayden
Handle
Stravinsky
Debussy
Liszt
Schubert
Schumann
Berlioz
Schoenberg
Brahms
Chopin
Monteverdi
Verdi
Mendelssohn
Weber
Gluck
Few would argue with your conclusion that the utter crap that passes as
music in the popular culture today will eventually fade from cultural
consciousness, although there is historical precedent for the adage that
the "bad drives out the good." (When Britney is put on a higher level than
Beethoven, you know society is in trouble.) Still if Pirsig is right,
great art's ability to the communicate humanity's highest values
transrationally across generations will, in the long run, prevail.
Evolution towards betterness driven by DQ will not be denied.
Regards,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 08 2004 - 15:18:01 GMT