From: Paul Turner (paulj.turner@ntlworld.com)
Date: Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:56:50 GMT
Chris
Chris said:
pssst, i will let you in on a secret - there are no levels just as there
are no Kantian categories.
Paul:
I don't understand your comparison. Has Pirsig, or anyone else, ever
said that the static levels are innate a priori concepts?
Chris said:
A priori levels are platonic forms
Paul:
Again, "a priori levels," from where did you get this idea?
Chris said:
Pirsig indeed is a platonist, a neoplatonist actually. Does the name
Plotinus ring a bell?
Paul:
Yes, I think Pirsig has said that Plotinus is the closest system to his
MOQ. I think it is a mistake to jump from a similarity with Plotinus to
an equation with Plato though. It is this kind of over-eager
categorisation that destroys originality and hinders understanding.
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:57:04 GMT