Re: MD quality religion

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 23:04:34 GMT

  • Next message: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Beyond"

    Dear Sam and others interested,

    I'm sorry, but unlike you (12 Mar 2004 10:17:46 -0000) I see even less need
    than in the (pop)idols-format to make criteria explicit for what constitutes
    a proper religion. In the 'Idols' TV shows they need to make a pre-selection
    by a jury of experts who have to agree on the criteria they use to exclude
    people from the competition, but only because there are thousands of
    candidates. With less than 10 religions competing (or if we are
    unrealistically optimistic a few tens), we can easily afford to allow a few
    related phenomena to compete until the vote in which they don't stand a
    chance because most people do not recognize them as 'religion'.

    What we MAY have to very clear about from the beginning, is that it is a
    competion between (descriptions of) religious PRACTICES, just like 'Idols'
    is a competion of singers and not of their songs.

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 12 2004 - 23:04:11 GMT