Re: MD quality religion

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Sun Mar 21 2004 - 14:29:59 GMT

  • Next message: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD quality religion"

    Hi Platt, DM, Matt K, all

    > Platt: IMHO, the MOQ is atheistic to the core.
    >

    Here is my Matt K inspired approach to the atheist question:

    Theistius: Are you an atheist?
    Moqist: An atheist is one that asserts that there is no God. I make no
    such assertion and do not accept being labeled "atheist."
    Theistius: Yes, but do you believe that God exists?
    Moqist: Such a concept certainly exists. Otherwise, what have we been
    talking about? Many people find God to be a useful idea for explaining
    their experience.
    Theistius: I want to know whether God actually exists. Not whether such
    an idea exists.
    Moqist: Before I answer, can you tell me why I should participate in
    this God/no God distinction that you've created?
    Theistius: You are begging the question. You are assuming that God is
    merely an idea that I've invented.
    Moqist: Indeed. But can you tell me why it is good to believe that
    there is a God without doing the same?
    Theistius: I guess not. I want to that you must believe in God and
    accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior who died for your sins and
    repent for the end is near or otherwise you will burn in the raging
    fires of hell for all eternity, but I suppose you would not accept that
    answer since it presupposes that there is a God.
    Moqist: You are right. I would not. Since you cannot answer, I see no
    reason why I should play the "god/no God" game and accept your label of
    "atheist" with its connotations of immorality. Now we were discussing
    whether or not God exists, but you just said that I "must believe in
    God." Is there is a difference between believing or not believing in
    God and believing or not believing that God exists?
    Theistius: I would say belief that God exists is a statement of fact
    while believing in God is to have a conviction of the goodness of
    asserting that fact.
    Moqist: Since I have not been convinced that it is good to believe
    that God is other than a concept, I have no conviction of the goodness
    of God, so it seems correct to say that I don't believe in God, so long
    as you don't call me an atheist or a wishy-washy agnostic who can't
    make up his mind. Such labels are unfair and beg the question of God's
    existence. After all, I only believe in one fewer god than you do.

    Thanks,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 21 2004 - 14:38:11 GMT