From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 17:32:58 GMT
Jim:Independently of such considerations, at the
level of atomic particles I would say that we do have static and dynamic
components: the static components are the aspects which we recognised as
conserved via conservation laws, hence the continued 'sameness' of the
laws of physics. The dynamic component is a continual exploration of
the particle's environment through its interactions which is known to
physicists via the various quantum wave equations.
DM:-
Hi Jim
I agree with this. If Pirsig has hit upon something with his SQ/DQ divide
replacing mechanistic causality with its subsequent evolution, it would seem
to follow that
we should also expect some sort of evolution of laws, particles, atoms,
molecules,
stars, planets, etc. If such an evolution has taken place, not so different
from what
has occurred with life but not using a DNA method of pattern fixing, then
this may explain
why the cosmos is as well organised as it is, i.e. the problem of the
anthropic principle,
in the same way that the human body, or any other organism, is wonderfully
co-ordinated.
Perhaps DNA is less the master of pattern fixing that something that
reflects a more
fundamental form of organisation. As per Bohm's implicate order perhaps. Any
thoughts?
Regards
David M
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 25 2004 - 21:57:32 GMT