Re: MD quality religion

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Mar 27 2004 - 13:38:14 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."

    Dan,

    > That's what I am trying to get at. "Labeling" someone or something
    > creates a notion, so to speak, in someone's mind of how that person/object
    > is. Doesn't that create perceptions, thus aleady gearing us to think one
    > way?
    > Your thoughts.
     
    Yes, and thank goodness labels do create perceptions. They are necessary
    for survival. "Look out for that (label) car!" can be a life saver. You
    wouldn't be too happy if someone yelled, "Look at for that (label)
    butterfly" instead.

    If someone doesn't believe in God I think the label 'atheist' is perfectly
    legit. If someone is not sure one way or another, the label 'agnostic'
    fits. 'Liberal' is descriptive of a person who thinks his government does
    good things.'Conservative' describes someone who thinks government should
    be restrained from doing good things because they usually end up badly.
    (Ex: the welfare state.)

    So I don't see labels as necessarily being negative. They are part of
    those cultural glasses we're all fitted with, necessary to survive in the
    society we happen to be born into.

    Pirsig invented a label for his MOQ--'Dynamic Quality.' Without it, he
    wouldn't have been able to get his ideas across.

    My point is simply that labels aren't necessarily bad. Your thoughts?

    Platt

                   

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 27 2004 - 13:39:50 GMT