Re: MD secular humanism and dynamic quality

From: Matthew Poot (mattpoot@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 00:42:11 GMT

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD secular humanism and dynamic quality"

    Hello Matt, all

    I have not been following this discussion, but I have some things to comment
    about.

    Matt: But when Pirsig says that it's values all the way down, it's the same
    thing as saying that it's bias all the way down.

    ..defining facts as high quality intellectual patterns of _value_ is the
    same as saying that the notion of an "unbiased fact" is empty...

    (-Poot-) Could you please Explain what you mean by this, as I do not fully
    understand what you mean to say here.

    Matt: 1) though I may think the "existing acquisitive and profit-motivated
    society" is endanger of losing it's soul, I don't think any "radical change
    in methods, controls and motives" being instituted would help in recovering
    our soul

    (-Poot-) Do you think radical change implies radical, in the temporal sense?
    Also, how do you view this "losing of soul" as , more specifically, Do you
    view the "losing of soul" as the change from the "existing acquisitive ad
    profit-motivated society" to something else, or vice versa?

    Matt: 2) If "a socialized and cooperative economic order" means the type of
    central planning effectively lambasted by Friedrich Hayek, then count me
    out. If it means the usual welfare system that _all_ capitalist nations
    have found is impossible to function without (don't forget corporate
    welfare, righties), then count me in.

    (-Poot-) Do you think that capitalism supports anything other than
    cetralization? Currently, what state would you say the welfare system is
    in?

     3) If a "free and universal society" and a "shared life in a shared world"
    mean something like what Marx meant it, count me out, but if it means
    something like the utopia Jesus sketched out, count me in.

    (-Poot-) What would you think of the "shared life in a shared world" that
    exists as we speak(write;-). When you look at it, we really do live in a
    shared world (how can you not?). I do not however believe that we have
    shared life (I.E. slavery, inequality, etc).

    Matt> Here's to hope,

    Cheers!

    Poot

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 28 2004 - 00:41:53 GMT