Re: MD junk or politics on this list

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 19:13:25 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD secular humanism and dynamic quality"

    Hi

    Yes, my definition of a conservative/republican
    is someone who claims to value freedom but
    draws a line in the sand limiting freedom a long
    way before us non-conservatives/republicans.
    Freedom for the sake of evolution, flourishing freedom as the
    highest value, go on Platt let go and give people with different
    life styles some freedom, freedom to make social relations that you
    wish to deny them with no benefit to yourself or others.

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Matthew Poot" <mattpoot@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 6:45 PM
    Subject: Re: MD junk or politics on this list

    > Hi Platt,
    >
    > you said: The state isn't obligated to grant benefits to individuals whose
    > choice of
    > > partners hinders procreation on which the state depends for its
    survival.
    >
    >
    > Well, I would say that this remark is a reflection of the survival
    instinct
    > taking over. Really, do the amount of Gay marriages amount to so much
    that
    > they would stop the procreation of humanity? Seriously....
    >
    > Personally, I don't care what anyone wants to do with their life in this
    > concern. Go marry a banana for all I care, its your choice.
    >
    > I thought that "freedom" was/is one of the American Ideals?
    >
    >
    > Just a thought
    >
    >
    > Matt (poot)
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Platt Holden <pholden@sc.rr.com>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:20 AM
    > Subject: Re: MD junk or politics on this list
    >
    >
    > > Steve P.
    > >
    > > > Do you support gay marriage?
    > >
    > > No.
    > >
    > > > Where do you think the gay marriage issue fits
    > > > in with the state versus individual war?
    > >
    > > The state isn't obligated to grant benefits to individuals whose choice
    of
    > > partners hinders procreation on which the state depends for its
    survival.
    > >
    > > Hope this answers your question. Note the lack of contortions to make
    the
    > > point. :-)
    > >
    > > Best,
    > > Platt
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 06 2004 - 19:26:22 BST