From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 19:16:56 BST
Hi Poot
You have spoken about money, others here
like their art, I thought of this when I read the following:
http://www.jeanettewinterson.com/pages/content/index.asp?PageID=122
regards
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: "August West" <augustwestd@yahoo.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: MD The Individual Level
> Platt, DMB, and Steve
>
> I think that Steve may have a point here...
>
> I was born into a house with a huge Beatles fan (my
> pops).. I liked the Beatles growing up (value
> pattern)... time went on.. I don't like them anymore..
> I am now head long into the Grateful Dead... I used to
> not have a beard (Value pattern).. now I do.. I used
> to have long hair.. I loved it.. I buzzed it last
> month..values change...values compose
>
> the MOQ will not fall apart without dominant social
> and intellectual patterns..
>
> "life goes on within you and without you"
> -George Harrison..Beatle...
>
> The knowledge of the MOQ may end, but that doesn't
> take the existence of DQ away... I wouldn't want a
> life without dominant social patterns.. or
> intellectual ones..(I fear having that world view at
> this point, I saw and read One flew over the cuckoo's
> nest..that's the joke..laugh) but it can exist and
> does exist.. elsewhere in the universe.
>
> I think this is what Steve is saying...
> Thoughts?
> -Augie
>
>
>
> --- Steve Peterson <peterson.steve@verizon.net> wrote:
> > Platt, DMB
> >
> > > More importantly, DMB reflects my own
> > > frustration when he says to Steve, "You've been
> > complaining about
> > > talking
> > > about people in terms of the levels of value for
> > as long as I can
> > > remember, but this objection never made sense to
> > me. Still doesn't."
> > >
> > > However, I've given up trying to persuade Steve
> > that unless people are
> > > granted the dominant role in the social and
> > intellectual levels, the
> > > MOQ
> > > falls apart. Maybe DMB will be more persuasive.
> > >
> > > Platt
> > >
> >
> > I keep saying that there is nothing wrong with using
> > the levels to help
> > understand people, so I am extremely frustrated to
> > hear DMB say and
> > Platt agree with: "You've been complaining about
> > talking about people
> > in terms of the levels of value for as long as I can
> > remember, but this
> > objection never made sense to me. Still doesn't."
> > I've lost interest
> > in trying to persuade either of you of my point that
> > though the levels
> > are useful in understanding people, the levels
> > themselves do not
> > primarily represent types of people but rather types
> > of patterns of
> > value.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 04 2004 - 19:23:21 BST