RE: MD Morality of deadly force

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat May 08 2004 - 21:43:17 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Patterns"

    MSH, Platt and all:

    Mark Steven Heyman wrote:
    ...If a premise is irretrievably out of sync with my sense
    of reality, then I'm afraid I'd have to toss the bath water, and the
    baby too. Pirsig/Phaedrus himself does this in ZMM, when studying
    philosophy in India, when a remark by his philosophy professor
    causes him to leave the classroom, and India, and give up:

            "But one day in the classroom the professor of philosophy was
    blithely expounding on the illusory nature of the world for
    what seemed the fiftieth time and Phaedrus raised his hand and asked
    coldly if it was believed that the atomic bombs that had
    dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were illusory. The professor
    smiled and said yes. That was the end of the exchange."
    (ZMM-PB, Page 126)

    dmb says:
    This is one of my favorite "scenes" in ZAMM. It's so very cinematic, don't
    you think? Blithely expounding and coldly asking. If I were the director I
    might even intercut a couple of mushroom clouds and the burning flesh of
    Japanese women and children just before the professor says "yes". As I read
    it, young Phaedrus is giving up because he's disgusted by the professor's
    lack of moral outrage. And even though the MOQ also holds that our static
    reality is illusory in a sense, it also asserts that the unfolding of this
    divided world is an evolutionary moral development and nothing but.

    On another note, it seems to me that Pirsig would certainly endorse the
    efforts of the Democracies to defeat fascism during WW2, I don't think he's
    endorsing or defending the bombing of Nagasaki or Hiroshima. Quite the
    opposite. One can support the cause and deplore the tactics without
    contradiction. It seems that Platt's reading seems to defy this. It strikes
    me as a rather crude formulation to equate terrorists and criminals with the
    biological level and then assert that we ought to kill them like germs. This
    sentiment echoes Hitler, not Pirsig. Jeez dude, its one thing to disagree
    about politics, Pirsig and everything else, but I never imagined there was
    so much murder in your heart. We don't reduce the entire human being to
    biology just becasue they've commited a crime or even if they are habitually
    anti-social. They are still social and intellecutual creatures even after
    being convicted, at least potentially. The implications of your postition,
    Mr Holden, are genocide and mass murder.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 08 2004 - 21:47:00 BST